tends to make a complete break between ontology and rhetoric, so that rhetoric itself in the end is of minimal importance for the theological claims being made. Such a complete break between ontology and rhetoric may be necessary and inescapable for systematic theology. For biblical theology, however, such a complete break is in my judgment unthinkable. The available “real” and “substantive” of biblical theology are only rhetorically available. Barth, at least at points, knew this, for his rhetoric
Page 19